• kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This comment section went downhill in a hurry. I’m locking this post for a while.

    Edit: Unlocked.

      • YaksDC@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        90
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Thank you for the very detailed explanation. I knew who she was but not about any of this. I read one or two of the books when they first came out but never really got into it. Also thank you for pointing out that just because someone does not know about the thing you like, does not make them a troll. I just wanted to understand the image.

      • chaogomu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        2 years ago

        The bathroom thing was just so stupid.

        It contradicts the lore of the books.

        The entrance to the Chamber of Secrets was literally built in a bathroom. She could have just said it was a Roman style bathroom that was later retrofitted to be modern.

        And Dumbledore let’s Harry know about the Room of Requirements by telling a story about how he once needed a chamberpot. A magic chamberpot? Sure. Makes more sense than shitting himself.

      • glorious_albus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Even the actors of Harry and Hermione (not sure about others) came out and said that they would have nothing to do with a Harry Potter continuation or reboot if JK Rowling was involved

        Source on this? Curious because the only thing I can find Radcliffe saying is “I’m very excited to see what other people do with it. The comparison I’ve made is to a story like Sherlock Holmes. I think the Potter series of books was always gonna be bigger than one interpretation or one franchise, so it’ll be cool to see the torch get passed on.”

      • Huby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        I agree with this for the most part, but saying Hogwarts Legacy objectively sucks is just wrong. Most people liked the game, including me (although the main story plot is not great).

          • cricket98@lemmy.worldBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            Hogwarts Legacy is rife with problems and those problems are objective. It’s not based on opinion.

            It’s so funny when people try to claim that their opinion is objective. Sorry bro, this is still your opinion. LOTS of people enjoyed the game, and if people enjoyed the game safe to say it did its job.

              • Aa!@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 years ago

                I’m pretty sure what you’re missing here is that you did give (arguably) objective descriptions of issues with the game, but it’s still your opinion that these make the game a failure. Sure, it didn’t meet up to your standards, but those standards are absolutely subjective.

                Lots of games are repetitive. Lots of games have no story consequences shown in the game. They still succeed at being games, even if they don’t meet your standards.

                I get it, you are passionate about this, but you’re mistaken at this point.

              • cricket98@lemmy.worldBanned
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                The basic standards of a game is “is it fun”. If people had fun then it served it’s purpose. Just because you didn’t like it doesn’t mean it’s an objectively bad game. I highly doubt your opinion on the game is free of external biases

  • XbSuper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    Lol, like she cares what anyone thinks. Lady’s loaded, our opinions are meaningless.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t care that future children will learn that the second most interesting thing about me is that I was hateful, because I have lots of money that will keep my corpse company!

      • a liar and/or sociopath
  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Isn’t that the lady who does a bunch of racism antisemitism and transphobia?”

    “Homer no! That’s JQ Lolling, probably one of the world’s greatest writers!!”

  • AMillionNames@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Indeed, it’s what happens when the unstoppable force of societal values meets the immovable object of someone’s personal ego.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    45
    ·
    2 years ago

    The Simpsons writers are experts on being the authors of their own public humiliation - they’ve been doing it for over twenty years now.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah I especially find this post hypocritical because matt groening is a super well known bigot! /s

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Lily Simpson did a great video exposé of the Simpson’s passive transphobia. Personally I think a lot of their gay jokes are regressive as well.

    • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      Keep in mind that lemmy downvotes don’t mean shit and you can just keep on liking her.

      • lowleveldata@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 years ago

        lemmy downvotes don’t mean shit

        What do you mean? I’m proud of that one comment that I made almost a hundred person mad