• ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    When I first heard ‘TERF’ I thought it was ‘TIRF’ for Inclusive. It caused me to inadvertantly piss off some TERFs when I kept treating them as someone who supported trans rights. Like, I thought it meant a person was trans themselves and a radical feminist.

    Apparently nothing pisses off a transphobe like attributing a level of humanity they’re trying to reject.

    Now I know better and I’d fuckin’ do it again.

      • Sophienomenal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I would say transphobia absolutely is radical. Of course, by the definition in which it is extreme. Say, for instance, by these definitions:

        Departing markedly from the usual or customary; extreme or drastic.

        Relating to or advocating fundamental or revolutionary changes in current practices, conditions, or institutions.

        The slang form of radical (being a synonym for excellent/wonderful) is merely a single definition, and when talking about politics (I hate to liken transphobia to a “political” issue, but it is heavily intertwined with politics now), its denotation is that of the quoted definitions above.

  • Sanguine_Sasquatch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not trans, but if someone labels themselves “radical” they’ve gone too far.

    Keep living your best lives, you deserve it

    • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      a common understanding of radical by self described radicals is “targeting the root of an issue” or the “wanting large systemic changes” that follows from that.

      for radical feminists this means recognizing patriarchal power structures as the root of most gender related opressions and wishing to overcome them. while we can critique their exact analysis, i think the idea that many opressive acts are symptoms of deeper systemic opressions maked a lot of sense.

      please don’t let opressors convince you that liberation in itself goes too far. a better world is possible and the struggle for it is righteous.

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is radical a bad word? Its use is generally associated with revolutionary politics. The usage of the term by TERFs stems from second wave feminist theory. They have to specify that they are Trans Exclusionary to distinguish them from radical feminists as a whole, who are not necessarily Trans exclusionary.

        • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Agreed. Only its obsolete connotation — hazardously unmeasured zealotry — would apply.

          That they describe themselves as the positive kind of radical unironically speaks to how deeply they misunderstood feminism from the start.

          • Of the Air (cele/celes)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            speaks to how deeply they misunderstood feminism from the start.

            Well, they did and didn’t. They are stuck in the past. 2nd wave feminism and current day white feminism. It’s, not good, but it’s not exactly ‘misunderstanding’ just focusing on entirely the wrong things.

            That or yeah, they’re lying about being feminists, which… considering they side with and use fascist talking points wouldn’t exactly be surprising.