• Fives@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    The super-wealthy are a cancer on society, and just like cancer, they suck up all of the resources while killing the patient.

  • Et Al@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    6 days ago

    Once you go beyond $100,000,000, there is no measurable difference in lifestyle. However, power accumulates. That amount of power shouldn’t be in the hands of so few.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    7 days ago

    This needs to become the mainstream opinion. Billionaires and ultra wealthy shouldn’t exist. There is no trickling down or any of that stolen wealth coming back into the hands of average people.

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    6 days ago

    He is right.

    Imagine a “billionaire” in the wild: An animal sitting on a vast horde of food that it could never eat while others starved around it … yea, it would not last long.

    Imagine a “billionaire” in a living body. A corporate money making entity would basically be a cancer that had to be removed to save the life of the patient.

  • splonglo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    6 days ago

    The wealth of the rich is still growing and it will continue to grow automatically until the middle class ceases to exist. If we do not take the assets back, it will become impossible for normal working people to ever buy a house, or have any economic power over their own lives at all - nevermind the political control or the media manipulation.

    Extreme wealth concentration is THE biggest issue facing society. Mamdani is absolutely right.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    7 days ago

    Even the billionaires would be better off without billinaires. It their relative ranking was the same they would still have more money than they could spend but it would now come with clean air, water, land, better infrastructure, a healthier world, happier people to interact with.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    6 days ago

    One cannot reign innocently: the insanity of doing so is evident. Every king is a rebel and a usurper.

    -Louis Antoine de Saint-Just, 1792

    Or, put in modern terms: There is no such thing as an innocent billionaire.

  • OpenPassageways@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 days ago

    They could just stop impeding progress and let the working class have things like healthcare and a living wage. Guess that’s too much to ask and they would prefer guillotines?

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      7 days ago

      Nah, the mainstream media will just stop reporting on him, the social media algorithms will be tweaked to hide him, and when it comes to the election, people will go “Ugh, who is that Muslim sounding guy? I’m voting for Barron Trump.”

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Mossad, Maga fascists, NYPD, All the billionaires all gonna be chomping at the bit to kill this guy to set an example.

      • Naevermix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Popular American politician starts saying radical but good things tends to end in a certain way.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Two US Democratic state* senators from Minnesota were just assassinated by a MAGAt impersonating a cop who carried with him a hit list of 50 other senators he was going to kill. This is not outside the realm of possibilities in this day and age.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            “Hey, we may have assassinated non-white people in the past for saying communist things, but we’ve totally changed now!”

              • Ænima@feddit.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                7 days ago

                Umm, it’s not a moral failing to highlight historical facts. A historian of WWII Nazism is not, in fact, a Nazi. There is real historical precedence for the idea that radical ideas for social change has been met with smears and, if unsuccessful, real violence against the leader(s) of that social change.

                Whether his ideas are successful, or not, the powers that run the world will stop at nothing to prevent their loss of power. I fail to see how pointing out that fact, and hoping this time is different while acknowledging that history, is somehow some moral failing of the OP of this comment chain.

              • Blackmist@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                7 days ago

                You have Donald Trump as a president and masked goons snatching people off the streets.

                You’re right it’s changing, and it’s not for the better.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 days ago

    I agree there is no reason why an individual should have that much economic power. There is no justification for that amount of wealth in so few hands.