I’m sorry but a child reaching freshmen year with their documentation that shows they are developmentally at a third grade level for reading and writing is unteachable. I know that may be a crazy opinion but I’ve never seen it this bad till this year.

Half a co-taught class developmentally 6 years behind where they should be. My co-teacher is losing their mind. I’m losing my mind. We’re doing stories that are 3 pages long and they forget what was 1 paragraph before. They don’t know how to operate a google document. Many have lost their homework sheets in their folder less book bags.

I don’t even really know the other half of my class since I have no time to talk to the students who are demonstrating the basic ability to follow a 2 step direction since I’m busy putting the fire extinguisher to other half who seemingly have never been told to do anything their entire life.

I cannot scaffold things any lower without it literally being a third grade level class. One child literally had documentation showing they don’t understand that stories begin and end.

Our biggest challenge of the year so far was writing a singular scaffolded paragraph with sentence starters based off a short story. Multiple paragraphs contained characters that simply did not exist in the story.

I’m losing my brain

  • Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    18 days ago

    If the revolution ever happens in the US we will need Cuban style literacy programs in every corner of the country.

      • alexei_1917 [mirror/your pronouns]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        18 days ago

        “We can’t teach communist theory to people who can’t even read a short pamphlet.”

        “The Commies just want everyone to know how to read so that they can make you read communist propaganda! Reading is for flithy pinkos!” - Something I’d be unsurprised to hear an American media outlet say.

        • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          18 days ago

          Something I’d be unsurprised to hear an American media outlet say.

          Not in those exact words, but Ive read articles claiming the high literacy rates are so people can be indoctrinated, and that’s why Cuba has such high voter turnouts

          • alexei_1917 [mirror/your pronouns]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            17 days ago

            Well, when you have democracy that works and people who feel like voting does something, you get good voter turnout! (Or you can just do like Australia does and make it mandatory to show up. Which led to Democracy Sausages, which is neat, but people are still going to just turn in a spoiled ballot if they don’t think voting will do any good.)

            If literacy rates are so linked to voter turnout, sounds like America needs some literacy programs. But no, they don’t decide to bemoan American illiteracy, they just start accusing Cuba of nonsensical bullshit recycled from Cold War accusations thrown at the Soviets, because the Red Scare never ended, baby!

        • cyberwitch@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          18 days ago

          Are communists, or anarchists for that matter, even capable of making their pamphlets short, though?

          Yeah, sadly the PuagerU people have nothing to worry about :/

  • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    18 days ago

    I’m gonna be real, the thing that actually scares me is how many teachers are redditers, if I had suspected any of my teachers were posting on reddit, I’d have pretended not to know how to read just to enjoy the aggravation

    Our school got rid of reading intervention because is racist and inequitable, apparently. Since latino students were disproportionately in intervention I guess it means that wanting to give targeted supports to them is actually a racist plot or something.

    See what I mean

    • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      18 days ago

      People always shit on the Hispanic kids but those dudes knew like 3 languages where I was growing up. People thought they were stupid for not knowing all the English rules even though their speech was fluent. No, you just hate them for being better at language than you and cause you’re racist.

      • Biggay [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        18 days ago

        this was my experience in HS too, latino kids in french got shit on by our professor because they could already sus out the conjugation and gender of words before most people and when they’d maybe get it wrong instead of corrections like the valley girl chick would get they got scolded.

      • boboblaw [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        18 days ago

        lmao, I’m pretty sure the ESL students were held to a higher standard. the difficulty had a noticeable dropoff after I got out of ESL—suddenly it didn’t matter so much if you knew how to spell “restaurant”.

    • VibeCoder [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      18 days ago

      My first question was why the kids weren’t getting reading intervention en masse. What is this bullshit about ELL students getting services being inequitable?

        • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          18 days ago

          It’s more than people consider any program that disproportionately serves people of color as racist against white people, but they’ve learned to borrow DEI language to obfuscate.

        • VibeCoder [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          18 days ago

          I’ll play devil’s advocate and say that there are plenty of teachers, especially white ones, who take one look at Latino ELL students and just throw up their hands and insist on services because they insist there’s a disability. “They can’t do anything” is a phrase I’ve heard many times. But the solution to that isn’t to discontinue the availability of services. It’s to insist on high quality data for referrals and educate teachers on how to provide that data. When done well, yes, this is equitable.

    • LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      18 days ago

      i used to take amazon returns at a retailer and iirc the official stats are an abysmal like 1/7 adults in my state being functionally illiterate but based on my time helping people through what’s a really brainlessly simple return process I would believe it’s closer to 1/5 or 1/4, like people staring at their phones like a westworld android just not seeing what’s in front of them. I understood having to deal with the elderly being overwhelmed by it but there were innumerable younger people too who I’d have to help to such a degree that “these people can’t read” is the likeliest explanation

      and this is just like reading steps like “take this to a UPS and show them this QR code” not like parsing paragraphs of story

          • Parzivus [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            18 days ago

            Where are you getting that from this post? I’m seeing a lot of levels and scores but not what those scores mean in terms of ability. 89% seems high unless you mean like scientific journals or something

            • When compared with the 27 OECD countries participating in the 2022 PIAAC, Canada ranked in the top 10 for the proportion of adults with high literacy scores, or those at levels 4 and 5 (276 and over), with 14% of the population at these levels, compared with 11% among participating OECD countries. Individuals at the highest proficiency levels of literacy can integrate information across multiple dense texts and reason by inference.

              The PIAAC levels can be found on this website (expand “Literacy Proficiency Levels”, see also the literacy samples that make it clearer what it actually means)

              • Parzivus [any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                18 days ago

                So looking at those levels and the examples they give, I wouldn’t say it measures literacy very well at all? They have three example texts and all of them are basically lists of facts. The longest of them is three paragraphs (and missing punctuation, always a good sign). The flaws of standardized tests like this are pretty well known by now, and the skills that are being tested here are only tangentially related to being able to read and understand a novel.

                I would not be surprised if most adults struggle to understand, idk, Finnegan’s Wake or something, but that isn’t really something a standardized test can tell you.

                • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  Reading about the actual tiers that test grades participants into, I’m not sure if “can read books for adults” is an accurate description of what tier 4 (which starts at a score of 65%) and above is determining, nor where the sample questions (all of which were extremely simple, straightforwards texts and tasks) fall on it:

                  At level 4, adults can read long and dense texts presented on multiple pages in order to complete tasks that involve access, understanding, evaluation and reflection about the text(s) contents and sources across multiple processing cycles. Adults at this level can infer what the task is asking based on complex or implicit statements. Successful task completion often requires the production of knowledge-based inferences. Texts and tasks at Level 4 may deal with abstract and unfamiliar situations. They often feature both lengthy contents and a large amount of distracting information, which is sometimes as prominent as the information required to complete the task. At this level, adults are able to reason based on intrinsically complex questions that share only indirect matches with the text contents, and/or require taking into consideration several pieces of information dispersed throughout the materials. Tasks may require evaluating subtle evidence-claims or persuasive discourse relationships. Conditional information is frequently present in tasks at this level and must be taken into consideration by the respondent. Response modes may involve assessing or sorting complex assertions.

                  It may be a little stricter of a requirement, since it sounds like at levels 4 and 5 the questions are frequently forcing guesses based on inferred information, and notably the highest tier only requires a score of 75% so even someone who is considered fully literate to as much as is feasible to test is still expected to/allowed to fail a bunch of the hardest questions.

                  I’m really not sure what the lower tiers look like in practical terms: “below level 1” is clearly like a grade school level or below, level 1 itself is maybe grade school level? Maybe 2 and 3 are more highschool level proficiencies? I really don’t know what’s expected of people or normal at a given level. It seems like the threshold for tier 4 is around the level of “graduated highschool with reasonably good language comprehension abilities” though.

                  There’s also this note alongside the scale, which confirms my assumption that even proficient people are expected to fail a lot:

                  NOTE: Every test item is located at a point on the proficiency scale based on its relative difficulty. The easiest items are those located at a point within the score range below level 1 (i.e., 175 or less); the most difficult items are those located at a point at or above the threshold for level 5 (i.e., 376 points). An individual with a proficiency score that matches a test item’s scale score value has a 67 percent chance of successfully completing that test item. This individual will also be able to complete more difficult items (those with higher values on the scale) with a lower probability of success and easier items (those with lower values on the scale) with a greater chance of success.

                  In general, this means that tasks located at a particular proficiency level can be successfully completed by the “average” person at that level approximately two-thirds of the time. However, individuals scoring at the bottom of the level would successfully complete tasks at that level only about half the time while individuals scoring at the top of the level would successfully complete tasks at the level about 80 percent of the time. Information about the procedures used to set the achievement levels is available in the OECD PIAAC Technical Report.

                  SOURCE: OECD 2023 Survey of Adult Skills International Report

                • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  What % of adults do you know that read a single book every year? Even multiple years. I’m willing to bet it’s a lot lower than you think.

      • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        18 days ago

        Every E-Mail Job I have the amount of people who can process any text longer than about 3 sentences is shockingly low. like 20% at the max.

        Like some parts of it is “I don’t care”, sure, but the amount of meetings I’ve had where I basically just spent an hour explaining about one page of text to some people is shocking

        • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          18 days ago

          This is the exact reason why so many meetings and phone calls have to happen even though it can be resolved through a short email chain. It’s because they literally can’t follow an email that’s more than 3 sentences.

      • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        18 days ago

        If I were to guess, these kids aren’t trying because businessmen aren’t trying anymore. The whole point of education is for jobs, and employers have proudly announced time and time again just how satisfied they are with the workers they got, they don’t even need to make jobs anymore.

        These younger students likely know many older siblings or cousins that did go through college and are now basement dwellers because no one’s hiring. Ergo, why would they take school seriously if even when you do well, you’ll be treated like you failed? Same logic why we have so little people actively trying to become actors in Hollywood, because only a tiny 0.000001% of the people that go for it will be successful. Now all industries have the Hollywood logic: if you’re not a nepo baby, forget it you’ll be lucky to even wash dishes no matter how well you do.

        TL;DR: With business owners just kicking back and refusing to ever lift a finger to put people to work, even children understand that they’re doomed and react to this nihilistic culture.

        • MaoTheLawn [any, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          ·
          18 days ago

          Nah, I don’t think they’re that aware of the job market. I think everything these days is slop and kids are fed gallons of it from the day they’re born, and use AI instead of thinking critically. Their parents are probably in a similar boat.

          • MrPiss [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            18 days ago

            I think the polycrisis, or whatever it’s best called, makes most issues have like a dozen interlocking and self reinforcing causes and effects. The nihilism in culture makes us hedonistic and slop oriented which makes us dumber which makes us unfulfilled which makes depressed which makes us hedonistic and so on with every issue. Kids can definitely see there being no good future for the Great Satan.

            • MaoTheLawn [any, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              Yeah yeah, I get your point - people always complained about young people, and lowbrow culture was always the dominant form - but at the end of the day it’s an entirely different mode of entertainment now, driven by hypercapitalist algorithms specifically designed to biohack your attention span.

              Sure, I used to sit and read the Beano or Far Side comics for hours rather than reading ‘proper’ books when I was a kid, but the mode of both consumption and production is worlds apart.

              Obviously, there’s other factors of societal collapse at play too, but it’s hard to deny that having screens with an endless tap of brain melting entertainment in our pockets has fundamentally changed the way we live our lives - probably for the worst.

        • Assian_Candor [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          18 days ago

          Worse with AI they’re explicitly seeing a massive institutional push to eliminate 80% of office jobs

          Who gives a shit about Canterbury tales learn to run wire is a completely understandable world view for the young

          • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            18 days ago

            Our biggest challenge of the year so far was writing a singular scaffolded paragraph with sentence starters based off a short story. Multiple paragraphs contained characters that simply did not exist in the story.

            sounds like ai

      • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        18 days ago

        Half a co-taught class developmentally 6 years behind where they should be. My co-teacher is losing their mind. I’m losing my mind. We’re doing stories that are 3 pages long and they forget what was 1 paragraph before. They don’t know how to operate a google document. Many have lost their homework sheets in their folder less book bags.

        this one sounds like long covid, the kid that doesn’t know stories begin or end is either fake or sequel fatigue

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    18 days ago

    It is not uncommon for me to have situations when talking to americans where it is obvious that their reading comprehension is very very bad. I’m not talking about political conversations, just general conversations I might have in gaming forums, movie forums, discords, etc.

    • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      18 days ago

      I’ve long since gotten in the habit of trying to rephrase and restate the core point I’m trying to get across multiple times when talking in general and generally to avoid making any sentence hinge on a single word to be interpreted correctly since even people who are literate tend to skim text and miss key words. I don’t always remember or succeed though: even here I had one particular old power poster blow up on me on several occasions when we were actually in agreement, because he missed a key word and reversed the meaning of what I was saying.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        18 days ago

        Oh now that you mention it I have seen that situation occur here where people miss one word and don’t realise they actually agree with each other. I may even be guilty of that myself though tbh.

      • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        I have seen a few arguments here and there where people have just seemingly refused to analyse what the other person has said and has just gotten mad at something they assumed they said. That is much more common elsewhere on the internet though.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        18 days ago

        I haven’t experienced it here at all so I don’t know about that. I just think hexbears are spicy and extra catty when getting into disagreements.

        • Dirt_Possum [she/her, undecided]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 days ago

          Yeah I don’t think it’s just a bias because I am one, I think it’s safe to say that the average hexbear is significantly more well-read and educated than the average American. But that doesn’t mean miscommunication isn’t a common occurrence here too, even specifically miscommunication due to someone not taking the time to really read and parse a comment. It’s happened to me several times and I don’t even comment all that much, but I see it often enough when just lurking. Not always during disagreements either, though the anger that can flare when there are disagreements makes it much more likely to happen.

    • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 days ago

      “Why are we having a meeting/talking on the phone when you could just send an email” takes on a whole new meaning when that is paired with the average Burgerlander being functionally illiterate.

  • trabpukcip [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    18 days ago

    Our biggest challenge of the year so far was writing a singular scaffolded paragraph with sentence starters based off a short story.

    I taught 11th grade students this 5 years before covid and it was nearly impossible then, too. I’m sure it’s more impossible now, but “the kids these days” have never liked doing school

    • alexei_1917 [mirror/your pronouns]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      18 days ago

      I hate that sub. Half of it is this kind of doomposting, the other half is utter hatred for children and teenagers, it’s such an interesting example of “you start to hate the people directly under you in the class system once you get a tiny bit of power to oppress someone who has no recourse”.

      • Civility [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        18 days ago

        It’s just the teacher version of retail workers venting about customers.

        Teaching is a hard job with no pay that requires a uni degree to do. There’s a baseline assumption that everyone who’s in it is in it because they care deeply about educating children. And schools are usually set up in such a way that they’re not really able to do that properly. And they see that every day and it hurts. The teacher version of “the customer is always right” is Solely Positive Regard. No matter what a kid does in the classroom a teacher (should) be trying to make sure that the kid still thinks the teacher thinks the world of them, and their parents should think the same and teachers (should) keep their cool in the classroom at all times. And that’s just not sustainable 24/7. Like retail workers the repressed frustration from being patient and caring and giving 8 hours a day 5 days a week gets vented in situations where it’s safe to do so. Teachers generally live in the community they teach and parents in the community are as much (often more) a “customer” as the kids are, often more, so only their families and other teachers (usually) get to see this.

        The vast majority of teachers don’t hate kids. If they did they wouldn’t stay teachers, f you read that thread closely the vast majority of these comments aren’t contemptous, they’re saying “I wish I had time/capacity/permission to teach this kid in the way I know they need to be taught. The way I have to teach them is an actively harmful waste of my, theirs and all my other students time”.

        • alexei_1917 [mirror/your pronouns]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 days ago

          I have noticed the “admin is worthless and the system forces wastes of time and resources and fails all the kids” posts. Those are good. I do understand the venting. It’s just that… I have seen some posts there where they seem mad at parents who stand up for their kids and lump truly right ones in with “My Little Johnny can do no wrong!” ones, and mad at admin who won’t let them mistreat a “problem child” in even more egregious ways than they’re already getting away with or remove that child from their classroom (they never care where that child would go, just “I need him Not Here”), and stuff where… they’re mad that they’re expected to have complete control over things they’re not given effective tools to affect in any way. Which is sometimes an obvious admin fail that they correctly blame admin or partially misblame parents for, and sometimes control freak behavior from admin that they’re angry at both the admin and the students for.

          It’s very possible I’m seeing a lot of it come off a lot worse than it was intended, just because I was on the receiving end of in class explosions by fed up and just plain abusive teachers and support staff a lot as a kid.

  • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    18 days ago

    I work with grad students and recently had some do an exercise where they had to do a short assessment with spell check turned off and no Internet connection. Only one performed at what I’d consider a reasonable undergraduate level. It’s not looking great out there.

    • Lerios [hy/hym]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      18 days ago

      maybe this is the dyslexia speaking, but i really think that spelling and being able to comprehend a text are two skills of massively different importance. relying on spell check and/or phonetic estimations can serve you perfectly fine in almost all situations and changes nothing, whereas being functionally illiterate makes your life more hollow

  • nothx [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    18 days ago

    What’s crazy to me about this thread (reddit), is the amount of posters that aren’t typing at a teachers writing level…

  • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    r/teachers is a place for people who hate children to make up stories about how the youth are completely stupid and irredeemable and it is all their fault for being lazy kids on their tiktoks and fortnites. I wouldn’t trust it to be any more based in reality than r/nosleep.

    • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 days ago

      That also sounds like the sort of shit I would write as a kid just to fuck with a teacher I didn’t like, to see if they were even paying attention. And if they’re posting on reddit about how dumb and terrible their students are, they probably have a lot of students who don’t like them and just want to fuck with them.

    • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      Having used AI story bots, I’ve not had an issue of new characters that aren’t meant to exist. I’ve had a lot of issues of characters in theory leaving the scene and then hey right back in it. And forced appearances of other people who are in the story, but definitely shouldn’t be bursting in immediately.