cm0002@piefed.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 天前Beware, another "wonderful" conservative instance to "free us" has appeared media.piefed.worldimagemessage-square591linkfedilinkarrow-up1790arrow-down182 cross-posted to: slop@hexbear.net
arrow-up1708arrow-down1imageBeware, another "wonderful" conservative instance to "free us" has appeared media.piefed.worldcm0002@piefed.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 天前message-square591linkfedilink cross-posted to: slop@hexbear.net
minus-squarepinball_wizard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 天前 Can’t we apply the same logic with leftists? It is imperative (to someone) that we do. Otherwise folks might wise up and get angry at billionaires.
minus-squareFlax@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·6 天前So if a pro-palestine rally has a jihadist, then they’re all jihadists?
minus-squarepinball_wizard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 天前The important thing is that we fight each-other, instead of requiring billionaires to play by any rules.
minus-squareubergeek@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·6 天前If they don’t eject the jihadist, then yes. And, frankly, I don’t know many, if any, leftists who would tolerate a jihadist, as they are just a different type of religious fundamentalist right winger.
It is imperative (to someone) that we do. Otherwise folks might wise up and get angry at billionaires.
So if a pro-palestine rally has a jihadist, then they’re all jihadists?
The important thing is that we fight each-other, instead of requiring billionaires to play by any rules.
lmao true
If they don’t eject the jihadist, then yes. And, frankly, I don’t know many, if any, leftists who would tolerate a jihadist, as they are just a different type of religious fundamentalist right winger.