Recently, we merry mods have been noticing many-a-comments being in the report queue for perceived negativity (the aim of the community being to provide “a break from the incessant negativity and rage”). What actions should we do about these, if any? Do we need a newsome another-rule for this?

Here’s what I think: Some skepticism and scrutiny is always quite needed knowledge—especially against information that’s actually untrue/misleading—and any bars I can think of for removing negative comments would apply to reasonable skepticism as well. Thus, the mod team is asking y’all to drop some bars!

Edit

Assorted examples of reported comments

Actually, you’ve missed the mark. It’s not whining about an advancement, it’s legitimate criticism of the US health industry. He’s just saying what we all know to be true which is that regardless of technological improvements, lifesaving care will continue to be ruinously expensive for those that are able to access it and gatekept from many others.

If you have a problem with comments like these undermining celebration of scientific progress, then maybe you should think about the structural political issues that lead people to disillusionment and cynicism rather than labeling people as conspiracy theorists.

You know “big red“ voted for Trump. It’s a cute story, but I hope he gets what he voted for In the end

It’s too bad that curing patients is not a sustainable business model. Even if this did work we would only ever see it developed if you had to take it twice a month for the rest of your life in order to survive.

Edit: sorry, I just noticed this is in Uplifting News. So, let’s be optimistic. Maybe global capitalism will collapse and governments will start trying to take care of people.

Nobody said anything about ICE, we’re talking about the military known for bombing weddings in multiple middle eastern countries and then bombing ambulances when they respond.

If you have the money to commit atrocities in a dozen countries at once, you have money to spare.

That’s .world for you; complaining about Reddit while trying to recreate it exactly

It’s very sad to see hype like this. They only had 30 enrolled, this was just a safety study, and while the data looks promising, there is certainly not enough statistical power, which is why there is no approval yet.

Shame on the BBC. If you are going to quote invesigators, you should state that they have paid consultancy deals with UniQure. The same two people were equally excited about a Roche therapy years ago…

But UniCure stock went up 200% today, which is the point.

  • OpenStars@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Your very desire to help aids in the restoration of my own faith in humanity (after I thought that Reddit had destroyed it all). I’m not joking - I really mean that. Such conversations on Reddit never ended well, but here on the Threadiverse they often (even if not always) do. I am glad that you are here, sharing your thoughts.:-) ☺️

    • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      well thanks. I’m trying to be less of the person I turned into towards the end of my stay on reddit. this place feels like a chance for social media to be okay again so I want to be better to it. thanks for being chill too and hearing me out 😊

      • OpenStars@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Same -> I did not enjoy who Reddit was turning me into. It is possible to disagree and not be a jerk about it, but on Reddit even agreeing with someone nearly always turned into an argument.

        Some spaces are like that here - namely news and politics - but then in the more niche spaces we get to be chill.:-)