But there is some degree of tolerance, and must be for diplomacy to work at all.
“No tolerance” would mean actually taking military action against the Zionist regime, at which point diplomacy has failed and the UN is no longer the correct forum.
Conversely, for the sake of minimising the destruction and loss of lives war causes, there always has to be an option to go back to diplomacy instead. Excluding him from the UN wouldn’t make him stop. It would just close off one way out of this horrendous war.
To see what happens to a cornered warlord with nothing left to lose and no option for diplomacy, look to the late stages of WW2: absolute war, massive waste of lives on all sides, missery beyond measure. That is what the UN was created for: to provide at least a chance to reduce human suffering.
That chance must be offered to Netanyahu, not for his sake, but for the sake of all the people that might not have to die for his megalomania. Walking out shows the disdain clearly enough, but it’s less definite than walling him off entirely.
No, I fucking wouldn’t. I’d call for domestic resistance. I’d call for economic sanctions. I’d call for military intervention. I’d call for all the same things that have been called for both in this case and in the Ukraine invasion. I’d call for all the tools of pressure to make diplomacy the most appealing option.
Besides, that’s a false equivalency anyway: Hitler wasn’t included in any UN talks either. That didn’t stop him, so why do you think shutting out Netanyahu would do so?
The whole international situation was fundamentally different and incomparable. Most obviously, there was no UN. There also wasn’t any firm set of alliances that would have issued sanctions or brought a stronger military response once war did break out.
Hitler was ignored, that’s why he wasn’t stopped.
On the other hand, Hitler didn’t have a nuclear power backing him up and forestalling any military response. He also had no “fuck everyone’s shit up, because mine is lost anyway” options left.
Netanyahu is protected, that’s why he isn’t being stopped.
The UN is an attempt to offer diplomacy as a resort because it’s better than whatever other last resort they might come up with.
No it sends a message that there is no tolerance for you especially trying to mimic the holocaust from ww2 that was the whole origin story to the UN.
But there is some degree of tolerance, and must be for diplomacy to work at all.
“No tolerance” would mean actually taking military action against the Zionist regime, at which point diplomacy has failed and the UN is no longer the correct forum.
Conversely, for the sake of minimising the destruction and loss of lives war causes, there always has to be an option to go back to diplomacy instead. Excluding him from the UN wouldn’t make him stop. It would just close off one way out of this horrendous war.
To see what happens to a cornered warlord with nothing left to lose and no option for diplomacy, look to the late stages of WW2: absolute war, massive waste of lives on all sides, missery beyond measure. That is what the UN was created for: to provide at least a chance to reduce human suffering.
That chance must be offered to Netanyahu, not for his sake, but for the sake of all the people that might not have to die for his megalomania. Walking out shows the disdain clearly enough, but it’s less definite than walling him off entirely.
Removed by mod
No, I fucking wouldn’t. I’d call for domestic resistance. I’d call for economic sanctions. I’d call for military intervention. I’d call for all the same things that have been called for both in this case and in the Ukraine invasion. I’d call for all the tools of pressure to make diplomacy the most appealing option.
Besides, that’s a false equivalency anyway: Hitler wasn’t included in any UN talks either. That didn’t stop him, so why do you think shutting out Netanyahu would do so?
The whole international situation was fundamentally different and incomparable. Most obviously, there was no UN. There also wasn’t any firm set of alliances that would have issued sanctions or brought a stronger military response once war did break out.
Hitler was ignored, that’s why he wasn’t stopped.
On the other hand, Hitler didn’t have a nuclear power backing him up and forestalling any military response. He also had no “fuck everyone’s shit up, because mine is lost anyway” options left.
Netanyahu is protected, that’s why he isn’t being stopped.
The UN is an attempt to offer diplomacy as a resort because it’s better than whatever other last resort they might come up with.
deleted by creator