• Valentine Angell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why? Netflix stuff might suck, and it might not. It’s just like any other label. Removing the branding is a worthless and shitly move in the long run. Netflix might be good or not, but that is up to the show.

    Removing “Netflix Original” is a poor decision that means you do NOT believe in Netflix as a brand.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think the issue is that they consistently suck, so people now associate the term with slop. Then they actively avoid it.

      • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lol, exactly. Netflix wanted people to think “Ooh, Netflix original, that’s gonna be great!” but instead they think “Oh dear, Netflix original. It’s gonna be slop that gets cancelled after one season.”

        Plus, the “original” branding isn’t even restricted to titles Netflix produced. They also apply it to things they simply licensed but have exclusive licensing in the showing country. A lot of anime is in this category, effectively “pretending” it’s an original when it isn’t.

        So the label at this point has become utterly meaningless.

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      it either sucks because it sucks, or it’s decent but sucks anyway because, being a netflix thing, it will end at season 2, completely unresolved. Either way it sucks

    • Ilandar@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Why not? You haven’t really made an argument as to why it should be retained. As the article states, this seems to be an A/B test that only applies to users accessing Netflix through the web interface. I’m not really sure how that indicates a lack of confidence in the name of Netflix.