Is… Is this a New Vegas reference? Or a different evil toaster? Find out this and more on the next exciting episode of: Extreme Hillbilly Armageddon T-Rex Jamboree 7

  • Hackworth@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    A.I. is much more suited to space travel than humans are. The next few decades probably determine whether future aliens first encounter Curiosity’s progeny or MechaHitler grey goo.

      • Hackworth@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        GPTs are based on a deep learning architecture called the transformer. Deep learning is a subset of machine learning, which is itself a subset of artificial intelligence. -Wikipedia

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          And how exactly are GPTs suited for space travel? Their lack of reasoning ability would doom any mission that doesn’t come with additional human oversight, and at that point you can just use non-AI computer programs and/or human remote control.

          • Hackworth@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Just pointing out the definition of A.I. that I am using in this context.

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Probes and robots are indeed better for exploring space than people. There might even be multiple uses of machine learning in future space exploration. However, it’ll only be used when it is the best option, and not for the sake of it like most “AI” we see today. This is because “AI” is business terminology entirely divorced from the reality of the tech. Machine learning is not genuine intelligence, but a tool for accomplishing goals, and it has very real limitations that make it not useful in all cases.

      The main thing that’ll hold back machine learning in probes is power, with probes relying on barely over 100 watts plus whatever dozens of watts their solar panels can generate in good conditions. Current machine learning hardware consumes many watts of energy to run advanced models, so whatever model is used needs to be extremely streamlined and efficient. This power limitation is not related to computing, but nuclear technology and the cost to send matter to space, so unless we pull compact portable fusion out of our asses, probes can only be so smart.