Like, would a skyscraper-style datacenter be practical? Or is just a matter of big, flat buildings being cheaper?

    • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It’s harder to do anything up high. Construction, climate control, transportation (moving something from one end to another), managing fires, additions, evacuation of personnel in an emergency, etc. etc., all get much harder when you build up up versus across.

    • Iced Raktajino@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Guess it depends on the height, but yeah. Otherwise, we manage to pump a town’s worth of water to the top of a tower well enough. From there, gravity can do the rest.

      But there’s probably a point where cost for that vs height becomes prohibitive.

      • shyguyblue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        There’s a slow, steady source of water being pumped into those towers, so the water level fluctuates through the day. They use gravity to get high pressure from your tap, but I’m the world of liquid cooling, you gotta go fast!