The current situation bears structural similarities to three major accounting frauds: Enron (2001), WorldCom (2002), and Lucent Technologies (2000).

Lucent, once America’s largest telecommunications equipment manufacturer, grew revenue through vendor financing arrangements. The company lent money to telecom carriers to purchase Lucent equipment, booking the equipment sales as revenue while the loans appeared as receivables. When carriers couldn’t repay, Lucent took $8.7 billion in writeoffs.

Lucent’s DSO peaked at 64 days before the fraud became public. Nvidia’s current 53-day DSO remains below that threshold but exceeds its historical baseline by the same percentage that preceded Lucent’s collapse.

Enron used Special Purpose Entities to hide debt and inflate revenue. These entities existed as legally separate companies but were economically controlled by Enron. The structure created artificial revenue through transactions with entities Enron itself funded.

The xAI SPV structure mirrors this approach. Nvidia provides equity capital to an entity that exists primarily to purchase Nvidia products. The transaction appears as an arms-length sale in Nvidia’s accounting, but economically, Nvidia is funding its own revenue.

  • Rimu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    The comforting thing about the conspiracy mindset is that it means someone is in control. They might be evil or selfish or AI or lizard people whatever but at least the world makes sense, has a structure and someone has it nailed down. People crave this security and will seek to build evidence for it. They may not “like” the picture they end up drawing but they like having a picture because it feels solid and graspable. Understandable.

    The scary truth is none of it makes sense, there is no one with their hand on the tiller and anything can happen.