Once an ice sheet begins melting or the Amazon rainforest begins dying, the process will not simply stop when emissions fall. We cannot hold blind faith that future emissions reductions or reversals can or will reverse avalanche-like changes to the natural world — and these pages are a convincing scolding of the policymakers for whom “conservatism or fatalism about society flips into extreme adventurism about nature.”

…despite Trumpian and Republican bluster, “a regime that embraces climate breakdown as the flipside of fossil fuels is preparing to treat it with something like sulfate planes,” especially if doing so would help reduce climate-caused migration from south to north.

In other words, a future energy secretary may well disagree with Wright that global heating is “no big deal” but agree that American oil must keep flowing and burning, and share the current administration’s xenophobia and penchant for mass deportations and illegal arrests in service of white nationalism. Such a global hegemon could dim the sun to square the circle.

  • jimmy90@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    Why so little analysis of the Communist Party of China from an author (Malm) who has called in these pages for an “ecological Leninism” and praised how Geoff Mann and Joel Wainwright explore the idea of an authoritarian, state-centered response to the crisis — a “Climate Mao” — in their 2019 book, Climate Leviathan?

    now why would the author leave out the only ones called communists

    groan