along_the_road@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.org · 5 days agoLatest ChatGPT model uses Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as source, tests revealwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square11linkfedilinkarrow-up1111arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@hexbear.netAii@programming.devfuck_ai@lemmy.worldfrancedigeste@jlai.luboycottus@lemmy.cachatgpt@lemdro.id
arrow-up1111arrow-down1external-linkLatest ChatGPT model uses Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as source, tests revealwww.theguardian.comalong_the_road@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.org · 5 days agomessage-square11linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@hexbear.netAii@programming.devfuck_ai@lemmy.worldfrancedigeste@jlai.luboycottus@lemmy.cachatgpt@lemdro.id
minus-squareLembot_0006@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down2·5 days agoLLMs are good for searching in technical documentation. And that’s it. They are barely usable outside this niche. Stop using it for “humanitarian” purposes. It can’t be a psychologist, lawyer or anything else similar.
minus-squaretangentism@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 days agoThey’re good for pattern matching on smear tests, etc and have a detection rate much better than humans (+90% to~75%)
LLMs are good for searching in technical documentation. And that’s it. They are barely usable outside this niche.
Stop using it for “humanitarian” purposes. It can’t be a psychologist, lawyer or anything else similar.
They’re good for pattern matching on smear tests, etc and have a detection rate much better than humans (+90% to~75%)