• infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oops! Now that we’ve perpetuated a global economic hierarchy of trade with raw agriculture products outsourced to India, it no longer makes economic sense to grow broadacre monocrops in our wealthy country.

    Please, won’t someone think of the poor struggling farmers who only farm 11,000 acres with 3 people? Just the modest area of 17 square miles, 3000 times what freed slaves in Reconstruction dreamed of in order to satisfy their every need, an area that would take you 2 hours to walk from one end to the other.

    There’s just no way to make that land profitable. No way at all.

  • Coolkidbozzy [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    3 days ago

    What am I supposed to do with 2.2 million pounds of rice?" he asked, raising his voice to be heard over the noisy industrial fans drying the rice on his farm in Merigold, Miss. "I’m serious. What am I supposed to do?

    I dunno, give it to food banks? Give it to cuba? Eat it with a large spoon?

  • Chana [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 days ago

    A “farmer” with 2.2 million pounds of rice. Sure.

    This capitalist and exploiter of the marginalized publicly declares their entitlement to profits, begs for sympathy.

    • TheVelvetGentleman [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You would be surprised how much land a single farmer can cultivate with modern equipment nowadays. A quick Google tells me you can expect 7000lbs of rice per acre. So that’s only 305 acres of rice. That’s not a lot for a modern farm.

      Farmers are workers, comrade.

      Also, if you’re wondering how a worker can afford 1000+ acres of farmland, the answer is massive amounts of debt.

      • KuroXppi [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        Farmers are workers, comrade

        This strikes me as a simplistic interpretation of worker and debt. The farmer who can afford to take on large amounts of debt is quantitatively and qualitatively different from the average worker. The average worker takes on debt for the prerequisites of gainful employment (education, transportation, equipment and uniform), not capital purchase for others to work on. The former gains a wage, the second makes a profit. Yes the latter is built off a proportionally large debt, but it is debt of a different nature.

      • TrashGoblin [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        A farmer who is able to own all of that land and that equipment, even with debt, and operates it themselves with or without hired help, is by definition petit bourgeois in terms of their relation to the means of production.

              • Chana [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 days ago

                That’s not “the big lie”, that’s just bigger capitalists extracting from smaller ones. Namely large finance capitalists extracting from smaller bourgeois. It is very transparent, they even write the numbers down on the contracts they sign.

                This does not change the fact that class is one’s relation to production, not their balance sheet. Nearly every small business tyrant’s business is in debt. Yet they have the relation of an owner, not a worker whose labor is exploited.

      • Chana [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        This person is by definition at least petite bourgeois, same as any small business tyrant with which you may be familiar. And they are publicly squawking about their entitlement to profits as a business owner. They have received over $30k/year in subsidies as a capitalist. This is the typical “farmer” PR game.

        Debt doesn’t mean they aren’t capitalist.

  • Llituro [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 days ago

    amerikkkan small producer farmers are the modern capitalism equivalent of when kings would pay a guy to be a hermit and live in their garden as part of the decor. they’re aesthetic set-dressing to maintain the mythologized terrain.

      • ComradeChairmanKGB@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        3 days ago

        The works of the roots of the vines, of the trees, must be destroyed to keep up the price, and this is the saddest, bitterest thing of all. Carloads of oranges dumped on the ground. The people came for miles to take the fruit, but this could not be. How would they buy oranges at twenty cents a dozen if they could drive out and pick them up? And men with hoses squirt kerosene on the oranges, and they are angry at the crime, angry at the people who have come to take the fruit. A million people hungry, needing the fruit- and kerosene sprayed over the golden mountains. And the smell of rot fills the country. Burn coffee for fuel in the ships. Burn corn to keep warm, it makes a hot fire. Dump potatoes in the rivers and place guards along the banks to keep the hungry people from fishing them out. Slaughter the pigs and bury them, and let the putrescence drip down into the earth.

        There is a crime here that goes beyond denunciation. There is a sorrow here that weeping cannot symbolize. There is a failure here that topples all our success. The fertile earth, the straight tree rows, the sturdy trunks, and the ripe fruit. And children dying of pellagra must die because a profit cannot be taken from an orange. And coroners must fill in the certificate- died of malnutrition- because the food must rot, must be forced to rot. The people come with nets to fish for potatoes in the river, and the guards hold them back; they come in rattling cars to get the dumped oranges, but the kerosene is sprayed. And they stand still and watch the potatoes float by, listen to the screaming pigs being killed in a ditch and covered with quick-lime, watch the mountains of oranges slop down to a putrefying ooze; and in the eyes of the people there is the failure; and in the eyes of the hungry there is a growing wrath. In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage.

  • regul [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m pretty sure there’s a rice shortage in Japan. Good thing we have an efficient global economic system.

    • anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      3 days ago

      There’s a food shortage in Japan in general. They’re net food importers. That’s why you keep hearing about agricultural innovations happening there like factory vertical farms and such. They’re capitalist so it’s not out of the goodness of their hearts, it’s because they don’t produce enough food domestically so they have to import and innovate or it all collapses.

    • The rice shortage is made significantly worse by Japanese rice-based nationalism and widespread refusal to eat imported rice. They could easily import more foreign rice for cheaper than domestic rice, but of course that isn’t happening.

  • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    Bro, at least try to write the article yourself. Don’t just tell ChatGPT to write a random story about a sad farmer. I made less than $40 on commissions last week, still had to spend all week working though, this POS probably made more than that for less than 5 minutes of typing a prompt.

  • oscardejarjayes [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    Things are not going great for American farmers. Thanks to foreign farmers normal Americans won’t starve, but these farmers might. This also screws small farmers the most, a lot of massive farming conglomerates can probably just pivot.

    This will weaken the American economy, and it will completely screw over rural areas and Trump supporters, and likely undocumented immigrants as well, while leaving those darn city liberals (i.e. Trump) chilling.