

is there a way to block all posts with links to a specific site?
is there a way to block all posts with links to a specific site?
Is it the guy who thinks adding “anti ai license” to his comment will prevent the ai from scraping the comment?
i know where you can find a bunch of ziptie handcuffs in convenient proximity to all those cops you’re arresting
so it does support ultrawide, but it is intentionally disabled?
With entrenched long-term resistance against the occupying force.
I don’t think they let you do it if you’re not a star.
No, because, you see, after a certain amount of time the land just defaults to the ownership of whoever currently occupies the land, morally speaking 🥰. Why yes, I do happen to be the current occupant of the land, why do you ask? Oh, the amount of time? That depends, of course!
So really, we’re using the epstein files to distract magaicans from the ongoing construction of the 4th reich/3rd republic/2nd confederacy, of which they are otherwise in favor? I’ll be honest with you when I put it out like that i don’t think it’s going to work.
deleted by creator
“It’s only the foundational principle of our supposed democracy. Don’t you know we only pay lip service to it, it’s not actually in force.”
Yes, there is an enormous contradiction between the declared ideology and actual policy in practice, I’m unironically glad you pointed that out. On the same hand, the constitution makes slavery legal, so maybe we should stop giving that fucking document so much god damned credit. None of our supposed rights are actually in force unless they are enforced. If nobody else is enforcing your rights for you, who does that leave to enforce the rights if you think you want them? I think it’s time we remember that the law is made up and it does whatever whoever is in charge of enforcing says it does.
Maybe you’ve noticed, but the single guy who has decided he is currently in charge of deciding what rights we are supposed to have is just making whatever bullshit rights up for himself off the top of his head, whatever is convenient to his purpose, without bothering to refer to legal precedent or the constitution, very frequently in direct contradiction of those. It’s working for him. Fantastically well. Let’s stop asking permission for these rights as if we weren’t supposed to be the ones from which the consent for government is supposed to be derived in the first place.
“Of the people, by the people, for the people;” I think that’s not an unreasonable (and constitutionally precedented if that’s important to you) right to substitute for the supposed right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness they teach us about in our state-mandated public education.
Also, I’ve heard this bit before about not a legal document not an actual right, has anyone ever actually tried to argue, in court, that eg we don’t have the right to be alive? Isn’t that already covered by like, murder law? what about labour/penal law for liberty and the rights to eg free assembly, free expression, freedom of religion for happiness? Don’t we have this right to life, liberty, and happiness de facto, or didn’t most of us have a reasonable facsimile up until relatively recently? Aren’t those laws/rights precisely the specific enumeration of the various ways we have our life, liberty, and happiness enshrined (or restricted, as in the notorious case of labour rights in america) as rights in the law?
christ there’s so many fucking contradictions. the whole system is held together with load bearing institutional loyalty and good faith it’s a wonder it took this long to collaps.
who the fuck downvotes this
Via is a public services scam and should be a scandal. “ride with via” yeah how about you fucking pay your workers a living wage, stop playing ‘contractor status’ games with your fucking employees and better yet, stop existing and give the money back to actual public transit solutions, because uber-run-by-the-city doesn’t fucking count and if you’ve ever actually used the service you know why, and I feel like the “fuck cars” comm might have exercised a bit more discretion in throwing their implicit endorsement here. Also, now that I have reason to look at this guy’s stats, what stat is he quoting? Did he select recent data from the pandemic? How would we know? He doesn’t cite a source or give a start or end year for the 80% comparison, so actually, what the fuck is he talking about? Furthermore, half or more of people in a major american city don’t own a car? Maybe, but, doesn’t that smell fishy? Has new jersey actually done such an amazing job of otherwise revitalizing their public infrastructure, or is this guy doing what so many other "smarter-than-the-average-politician"s do with statistics? Anyway, where’s his information supposed to be coming from? Not for nothing, my experience of installing bike lanes is that people ride bikes first, get upset at the number of incidents and demand change at a local level; demand first, then supply. Not saying it cant happen the other way around, but that simply hasn’t been my personal anecdotal experience of american bicycle infrastructure. Also, am I crazy? Doesn’t this post give AI once you’re looking for it? the emojis? “here’s the reality?” What is this bandwagon you have all just jumped aboard?
tl;dr this post is sus and y’all need to practice some fuckin media literacy.
deleted by creator
peaceful protest is allowed by the constitution because it is ineffective
a riot is the language of the unheard
nobody in the world has ever won their freedom by appealing to the moral sense of the people oppressing them
What’s this? Did trump get his SLAMuppance? Finally, what we’ve all been waiting for!
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Cool. Now cite a single source and dont use AI to “help” you write it.source cited. AI making it harder to relate to this information as a human still sucks tho