AI cannot be relied upon to follow its own rules, prompt injection or no.

https://fortune.com/2025/09/02/ai-openai-chatgpt-llm-research-persuasion/

I don’t think there’s any speculation that it’s real. The question is whether it was created with AI and/or edited.

Yes, absolutely.

My fear is whether Americans will choose socialism right now. I’m in a very queer, anarchist bubble and I’m not sure how to tell how popular this sort of thought is.

My concern is how thoroughly Americans have rooted socialists out of power and how all of our media will insist that we need more fascism, not less.

I’m fairly reflexively anti-AI, but have to admit this is a great use for it.

I’m not sure we can generalize about people who enlisted after 2016, but is there a point to that cutoff? A lot of people have been in the military since before 2016.

There’s no question. Chatbots are implicated in a lot of suicides, shattering the first rule.

There could be an interesting conversation about whether the environmental impact ALSO breaks the first rule, but that conversation is unnecessary when chat bots are telling kids to kill themselves.

I think you’re correct. But if so, that means a lot of people are going to die and even after they die, we have no guarantee that the next power structure will be any better.

shrug

This is why this completely unsupported graphic on the internet seems unreliable to me. If you want to quibble about WHY one shouldn’t believe a completely unsupported graphic on the internet…okay.

Do you think that someone should believe a graphic on the internet without verifying the information from a reputable source?

It feels like they tanked the test out of spite. I’m curious about the methodology of the study, but France has far too much tourism to believe this without seeing the underlying data.

It didn’t occur to me that the people in the graphic might be women. 😆

Respecting people is way more important than “getting” a meme, so your head’s in the right place, regardless.

The major difference is that one is happening and the other is a fever dream from the perpetrators of the first.

“Traditional” gender roles say the man is the “breadwinner” and the woman cares for the house.

I’d bet he was picking an argument and expected her to say that she planned to work. Maybe there was some hope that someone desiring to be a trad wife wouldn’t find the first message off putting, but my money says his main goal was arguing and he blocked her because she’s cleverer than he.

Sensible people don’t watch corporate media. We know what they’ll say about Mamdani because they’ve been useless for at least a decade and already slander NYC as much as they can.

He was searched earlier by the victim and the gun wasn’t found. If there’s a rumor that a 6 y/o has a gun, yes, telling the principal seems like an obvious step somewhere in there. One would expect her to take the possibility seriously.

They hate us for our freedoms.

Removed by mod

“In theory”? More like “Move fast and break society.”

Jesus Christ, you people shoehorn your terrible logic into everything. The way you get giddy when terrible things happen is highly related to why your shitty candidate lost.

Private flights can fly into smaller airports with no ATC. How much traffic do they make up at larger airports?