

There’s always more to the story than what a news article and lawsuit will give, so I think it’s best to keep that in mind with this post.
I maintain that the parents should perhaps have been more perceptive and involved with this kid’s life, and ensuring this kid felt safe to come to them in times of need. The article mentions that the kid was already seeing a therapist, so I think it’s safe to say there were some signs.
However, holy absolute shit, the model fucked up bad here and it’s practically mirroring a predator here, isolating this kid further from getting help. There absolutely needs to be hard coded safeguards in place to prevent this kind of ideation even beginning. I would consider it negligent that any safeguards they had failed outright in this scenario.
If we’re to have a serious conversation on this for a second - my view is that I don’t push people towards the lifestyle choices I’ve picked (veganism, Linux, meditation, etc.) but if it seems the person is already open to something I do, I’m happy to answer their questions in a non judgemental manner and be a resource for them.
I’m truthful in what I say, and I will just as easily tell them the bad things (no Photoshop, learning curve, you may find yourself running commands sometimes) as well as the good things so they can make an informed decision.
I’ve had one friend move over to Linux Mint on his laptop because he saw I was already using it and realised it’s actually doable, and another friend start considering vegetarianism more seriously
I feel that if you constantly tell people how awesome and great Linux is and they’re missing out, you just look like you’re part of a cult and not a rational person.