

And people ask why I support him…
안녕하세요!
And people ask why I support him…
Out of sight, out of mind
This is how we treat rats in the lab. Sorry if you buy any products tested on animals.
Distro? No. Wayland? Yes…
I read most this article and don’t see how any of it is false or misinformation. Literally the first word in the page is “alleged”, and it’s full of arguments with linked citations from both sides
Wait, how is you providing evidence to back up your argument “doing work for others”?
JK we all know the answer … 🤡
Link or gtfo, let people check the sources themselves
Why wouldn’t they default to not accepting any AI generated content
If you can accurately detect what content is AI generated, you’ll have a company worth billions overnight
You don’t need to go to the hospital for a sprained ankle
No, in this case autopilot never disengaged (but according to the article, it should have issued the warning and disengaged earlier)
Rare Australia W
There’s a lot of really bad slop on YouTube. Your algorithm might be curated to “documentaries”, but that’s far from the norm
Hello from Lemmy.ml!
We’re seeing each other’s content even though we’re using different websites and different apps. That’s the fediverse for ya!
Why are you paying these oligarchs at all? Pirate your music
Putting a title on it (I.e. “Big beautiful bill”) doesn’t mean it is a big, beautiful bill.
I’m not skeptical of DEI because I’m against “diversity, equity, and inclusion”, I’m skeptical because of piss poor implementations of it I see in the workforce
“Dude” can refer to women too: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/282694/is-dude-becoming-gender-neutral
I was going to make a comment that it depends on location, but then I pulled up the state for Nicaragua and even over there women are only giving birth in any significant numbers after 16-17. So yea maybe not significantly. Dude’s weird
These responses closely mirrored examples of the false claim from pro-China sources, which alleged that Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was suppressing opposition voters by deliberately withholding voter notifications.
There’s two things at play here. First, all models being released these days have safety built into the training. In the West, we might focus on preventing people from harming others or hacking, and in China, they’re preventing people from getting politically supportive of China. But in a way, we are all “exporting” our propaganda.
Second, as called out in the article, these responses are clearly based on the training data. That is where the misinformation starts, and you can’t “fix” the problem without first fixing that data.
How would Gopher side step this?