• 1 Post
  • 4.41K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 24th, 2023

help-circle

  • Indeed.

    I’m not even making a judgement on Corbyn here. People can love him or hate him, either way it doesn’t change the fact that by splintering support, under our voting system, you only strengthen the opposing side.

    It’s like… one of the headline problems with FPTP as a system.

    At the very least, Sultana and Corbyn could’ve joined or allied with an existing party they align with, the Greens. Seriously look at Corbyn’s recent remarks and his open letter, and Sultana’s too.

    There’s basically no distinction between them and the Greens, yet they’re choosing to battle against them in each constituency? It’s just electoral self-harm.






  • I’m a very vocal critic of LLMs, I think they’re so overhyped and overused it’s hard to believe.

    But I’m also getting really tired of people purposely putting extreme effort into tricking the LLM into saying something harmful if someone were to follow it blindly, just so they can make a clickbait headline out of it.

    And what the hell is up with the major “ChatGPT is Satanist [if you instruct it to be]” angle? Are we really doing the Satanist moral panic again?

    ffs, criticise OpenAI for being closed af, being wasteful, being strong political lobbyists, for stealing work, etc. You don’t need to push disingenuous stuff like this.













  • Probably a good thing that will benefit us.

    The problem is, like with most things this government seems to be doing, we won’t feel the benefit for a long time. People are impatient and they want results now.

    Whether that’s reasonable or not doesn’t matter. It’s the reality, it affects polling, and will affect the next general election.

    Things like this, the planning reforms, the infrastructure spending they’re doing, SureStart 2.0, NHS improvements, green subsidies, etc won’t start to bear fruit until Reform are in, and they’ll benefit from it, only to then tear it all down so the next government inherits the same poisoned chalice this government did last year.


  • I swear people just want to be unhappy.

    We say we don’t want companies to illegally hire, yet when they do and face the consequences of it, we get sob stories like this that basically state “actually businesses should be able to break the law if it’s more profitable to do.”

    We can’t have low fines, otherwise companies just treat it as a cost of doing business… I’m sure we’ve all seen stories of big companies knowingly breaking the law and being fined pennies, and things like small companies fly tipping because occasionally being caught works out cheaper than proper waste management.

    The onus is on the hiring company to check if the person has all the required paperwork and has a legal right to work.