Nationalised oil probably helps too

Thanks for sharing your experience, I didn’t realise it was a pop-up hell hole as I use blockers.

In future I’ll paste the review text here too.

Gee, you think?

No biases here at all.

Used an old eee701 as a server for a fair while, pretty sure that was equal or less power usage than the Pis at the time.

True. And the comments after that agree that the main point still stands.

Lemon64 thread

This comment sums it up pretty well:

“If you watch the video you will understand the title is a bit of a clickbait. He is not buying Commodore, he wants to deal to get cheaper licensing fees for whoever wishes to use the Commodore name. For example Ultimate64 could become the official Commodore FPGA board. I don’t see this changing anything to be honest. Unless this will mean that we can buy a brand new C64 based on Ultimate64 (with case, keyboard, keycaps etc) at a sub 200€ with VAT price. Which I doubt.”

There are usually sources listed on Wikipedia articles

Isn’t that part of the problem and his tactic in all this, as you can’t just point to a list and say “all these things here”, as there’s so much dead catting going on, you can’t keep up.

Is there a list of every time he’s violated the US Constitution?

Did this only apply to the US?

Does he stammer? And even if he did, it’s not exactly a clever nickname. Then again, the “Keith” thing is pretty dumb

Perhaps you’ve ignored what’s actually happened over those 15 years.

It’d be far worse under the Conservatives.

He’s not a Conservative.

Works for the Bene Tleilax

Huzzah!

No better time to learn!

" The minimal configuration for a NetBSD/i386 system requires at least 32M of RAM and 512M of disk space. Smaller configurations are possible, but require e.g. custom kernel configurations.

Any i486 or better CPU should work - genuine Intel or a compatible such as Cyrix, AMD, or NexGen."

The term “let’s slow time this” was used for a while. I can only assume that was some corporate phrase.

Can always go for NetBSD?