• 1 Post
  • 110 Comments
Joined 4 个月前
cake
Cake day: 2025年3月8日

help-circle


  • That is a good point, though the separatists themselves disagree, as they’re still working to submit their own petition. I guess the question remains of how many times a petition like this can be made. If this one fails, can the separatists put forward another one? That’s not going to be great. “Alberta couldn’t pass a petition to stay but could pass one to leave.”

    Another thing to consider is our neighbour to the south. If the petition to leave passed, would they care that the threshold is extremely low, or that this doesn’t actually mean that Alberta has separated? It’s not like Trump has stopped believing that we should be the 51st state, and it’s not like anyone in the American government cares enough to stop him.

    A petition to leave passing might compel Trump to “little green men” us, because, y’know, we “voted” for it.

    To be frank we’re just in a really shitty situation.



  • Except you’d want to sign it. It’s not a petition to leave, it’s a petition to stay.
    The separatists were proposing a question “Do you agree that the province shall become a sovereign country and cease to be a province of Canada?” which would mean even if, for example, 2 million Albertans refused to sign it, it wouldn’t matter if 177 thousand people agreed to do so. Under the new question, “Do you agree that Alberta should remain in Canada?” if those 2 million Albertans signed the petition, it wouldn’t matter if those 177 thousand refused to sign it. Granted, it is a gamble because it’s easier to do a thing rather than not do a thing.
    I could be wrong on his intentions, but considering that Lukaszuk is the head of a movement called Forever Canadian, and from his twitter it seems like he’s pro-Canada.
    Edit: I meant it’s easier to not do a thing rather than do a thing, wording got mixed up there.

















  • The GTX 1070 was in the upper tier of gaming GPUs when it was released, categorized as high-end on Wikipedia. Most people wouldn’t be able to justify the cost of its kind of performance until years later, even if the next thing didn’t happen…

    It’s still 9 years old.

    About half that long ago, GPU prices tripled, and prices are still absurdly elevated today even adjusting for high inflation. This has significantly delayed a lot of peoples’ normal upgrade cycles, so your 9-year-old GPU is effectively more like a 4-year-old GPU with respect to affordable upgrade path.

    a) This isn’t Remedy’s fault.
    b) The card is still 9 years old.
    c) You can still play the game with a 9 year old GPU

    Back when that card was new, running a first-person game at 60fps 1080p was mainstream and not particularly impressive. That level of performance is mediocre-to-weak today

    That wasn’t my experience in 2016 when I was rocking an HD 7850, and getting less than 60fps at 1080p for FPS’s in 2016, a card that would have only been 4 years old at the time (and technically worse than what was in the PS4).

    (And by the way, the other GPU they mention is only 5 years old.)

    And about 15 percent more performant than the GTX 1070. With an MSRP about $100 less than it, and it being considered midrange.

    Also, none of that really answers my question: What performance were you hoping that this GPU + CPU combo would give you?