- 6 Posts
- 790 Comments
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto Green Energy@slrpnk.net•Can somebody please explain why the world hasn't gone nuclear yet?1·1 天前Why would we need to store energy for more than an day? We only need to smooth out the difference between supply and demand.
The mayor advantage of the European grid is the disconnectedness over long distances. There are always enough places where the sun shines or the wind blows.
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto Mental Health@lemmy.world•Arizona study finds car dependency reduces life satisfactionEnglish5·2 天前They had UBI for a month during the pandemic.
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto Green Energy@slrpnk.net•Can somebody please explain why the world hasn't gone nuclear yet?3·2 天前I am not arguing that nuclear should have been phased when it was, as that resulted in more coal and gas, but that clinging to it now is a mistake.
Building a new nuclear power plant in Germany would take a decade if things went well. Until then grid battery storage can mature and demand adjustment projects can be rolled out. It’s probably also easier to convince germans to accept pumped hydro where they live over nuclear.
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto Green Energy@slrpnk.net•Can somebody please explain why the world hasn't gone nuclear yet?4·2 天前With the same amount of money you can build so much more renewable generation and storage than nuclear.
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoHacker News@lemmy.bestiver.se•Bad Actors Are Grooming LLMs to Produce FalsehoodsEnglish21·2 天前How dare they replace the random falsehoods LLMs normally produce, they their curated falsehoods!
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto Green Energy@slrpnk.net•Can somebody please explain why the world hasn't gone nuclear yet?52·2 天前It is also massively uneconomical. Even with existing subsidies, like free insurance and long term storage, plant operators don’t want to keep going.
Modern day nuclear advocates are like the Japanese soldiers in the 70s refusing to admit the war was lost decades ago.
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto Green Energy@slrpnk.net•Can somebody please explain why the world hasn't gone nuclear yet?51·2 天前The only reason “civilian” nuclear power exists is as a fig leaf for nuclear armament.
I don’t think post war Germany had the delusion of their own nukes. Here the nuclear industry just exists to shuffle public money into private pockets.
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto World News@quokk.au•EU's population hits record 450 million with numbers driven by migration, Eurostat says21·2 天前Good. Under the current economic system we need continuous population growth and migrants are more likely to do jobs not enough people want to do (backer, age care, …).
They yearn for the tails of their ancestors.
That’s a centrist pipe dream, the morons accelerated them both to the right.
Great quiz. It teaches you the rules while training you to expect the unexpected, even in the rare cases that the rules are applied consistently.
I got exactly half the questions right.
Leider hat die einzige funktionierende Wasserqualitätskarte nur Infos für offizielle Badestellen.
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•AI cannot replace humans spiteful spirit2·3 天前Who do you think is better at writing assembly? @harbard@fedia.io or a modern compiler with hundreds of contributors.
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto DACH - Deutschsprachige Community für Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz@feddit.org•Klärwerke klären ihren Energiebedarf zunehmend selbst1·3 天前Der Generator ist durch die Menge an Flaugas limitiert, also müssen wir alle mehr scheißen.
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•AI cannot replace humans spiteful spirit2·4 天前There are also react devs creating the windows 11 start menu.
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto China@sopuli.xyz•Israel enforcing Gaza evacuations with Chinese grenade-firing drones1·4 天前How are they related?
Just because it’s about china and israel?
You call things the way they were defined. Problem solved.
What?
I’m kinda confused, because this is the second time now where your attempt at making a counter argument is actively supporting my point. Is this intentional at your part?
We are ultimately arguing about subjective preferences. I favor of certain syntactic sugar because I believe it improves readability while you seem to be arguing for strict consistency above all else.
So by what metric are we measuring our points?No we don’t. If your point relies on Turing-tarpitting the whole discussion … then you have no point.
I admit, that was hyperbolic, but I don’t see what syntax for data manipulation other than functions would be left in your ideal language.
Yes, but the visible light will overpower the glow.