Removed by mod

debian

fedora

opensuse tumbleweed (which happens to also be rolling release)

gentoo and lfs make it very clear they’re demanding distros. arch is just a little easier, but it’s closer to gentoo than to debian

that’s a little besides the point. my point is that you have to always be ready, even if an actual intervention event takes a while to happen. you’re used to it and/or got lucky, but the op is not the first person i see having issues like this and getting blamed for them because they should know better

i believe you. also, my great uncle has smoked since he was 13 and he’s now 86 and is still alive

seriously, though, if you do everything right, arch is a great system. it is really well put together and very stable all things considered. the problem is the “doing everything right” part. what happened to op is pretty common if you stop reviewing your updates one by one for a week or two. if you’re used to that, then arch is perfect. otherwise, it’s a chore

arch only works if you think maintaining every detail of a linux system is fun, because you have to constantly know what you’re doing and that’s a huge commitment. stuff like what the op described is bound to happen if you ever get bored of it and decide not to pay much attention to the system one particular week

yeah, it is pretty fun, i used arch for a long time years ago and i liked it. but it’s a huge commitment and you can’t ever forget the system exists (which sometimes you need to do if you have a life)

it is

…if you’re willing to put in the effort to play linux

this is an arch linux problem, not a rolling-release problem. tumbleweed doesn’t have issues like that

debian testing is for testing purposes only. you should never daily drive debian testing (unless you know what you’re doing)

also, we’re about to get a new debian release (trixie), this is literally the worst time you could choose to daily drive debian testing

arch is for people who want to play linux. if you actually want to use linux, go with something else

can someone summarize the video?

no and no, but they have a ton of potential

the retweeter thinks that ADHD people are paralyzed by absolutely anything. People saying it’s their motivation are motivated by not wanting to be one of those ND people.

makes sense

but it’s kinda out of our control, though, isn’t it? we can try our best to do shit, but sometimes we can’t do shit, and that will be it. beating ourselves up over it does nothing to help. in my case, simply accepting that sometimes i won’t be able to do shit is actually what helped me the most

I’m sure some of the commenters were assholes

most of them, including the original rt

i see your point (i don’t relate at all, but i see it). it’s just that, to me, it’s just repeating something i know already, heavily implying i’m just faking it

the op is kinda silly, but i am strongly suspicious of anyone who complains about people that supposedly “blame everything on their diagnosis”. more often than not it’s just a neurotypical that hates us and thinks adhd is an excuse for laziness, which i believe is 100% the case for the rt. adhders who don’t take responsibility for their problems do exist, but i’d rather err to the side of not harming us any more than the neurotypicals already do

and it’s super weird to me that someone would be motivated by someone who thinks your diagnosis is fake

acabei de sair mas deixei uma bandeirinha da bahia e uma de minas

tô fazendo uma bandeirinha da bahia logo abaixo da bandeira do brasil

this is purely anectodal, but i’ve tried getting coding help from gen ai a few times and it was never helpful

the last time i tried was particularly ridiculous: i was looking for z-combinator implementations in rust on google and gemini gave me an implementation suggestion. for those who don’t know, the z-combinator is an eager variant of the y-combinator and the point of both of those is allowing you to implement recursion without using recursion directly

the code generated by gemini used recursion

and it didn’t even compile

i wanna touch on one of the points the article makes: every successful marxist revolution happened outside the core of capitalism. i honestly believe we’re never going to see a successful revolution in the 1st world and i don’t understand why so many people used to believe a socialist revolution would only be possible in developed countries

for some reason, i have both gnome platform 46 and gnome platform 47 installed in my system. that’s probably it