jack [he/him, comrade/them]

  • 187 Posts
  • 1.62K Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 26th, 2020

help-circle







  • There’s no lack of clarity on the subject in this thread. Using the word “conflict” sometimes in no way undermines our ability to call it out as a colonial genocide. What is the nature of the conflict? Colonial occupation and genocide supported by history’s most violent empire. If we only ever called it a conflict in order to obscure the nature of what’s happening, I’d agree. We should critique the way imperialist media does exactly that.

    But it’s not not a conflict, and using that term to refer to the whole situation concisely amongst ourselves - knowing how we as anti-imperialist communists actually analysis - in no way gets in the way of how we discuss it. There is no single term that can describe it without leaving some potential ambiguity or missing important details. Call it a genocide, but it’s not just a genocide. Call it an occupation, but it’s not just an occupation. Banning the word “conflict” doesn’t help us at all in communicating amongst ourselves.