leafperson [any, any]

  • 0 Posts
  • 17 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: August 21st, 2025

help-circle


  • how tf is a solution “extremist rhetoric”? ohh sorry black lives matter but also the historically and presently racist police force that exists to enforce laws passed by racist legislators (specifically made to target disadvantaged, usually non-white demographics) deserves to keep getting rewarded for its bad behaviour. ohh sorry palestine should be free but dont vote for anyone who will stop funding israels genocide.

    “I get you’re upset at the system guys but if you start doing something I’m gonna be upset at you, but also im totes your friend and agree that these problems need fixing! lets be blue voting besties this election!”




  • You mean the ruling class propagates bigotry as a ‘laying of emotional groundwork’ so they then have more pull among the artificially privileged (usually the majority) which they can use to back their rule? I’ve always found it interesting how much the anti-bigotry groups seem to propagate “inverse” bigotry (“rich white men” being the problem), I feel overly cynical to say that they are spearheaded by the same ruling class who are responsible for the current state of bigotry but it really feels like it sometimes.

    I don’t actually agree that the ruling class are white supremacists because they are white, they continue white supremacy because it benefits them (because they are white), but I’m not convinced that the ruling class would be white if not for white supremacy, at least in the US people have been migrating long enough that without racism I don’t think the ruling class would be near ethnically homogenous.

    I’m just rambling but you can’t read so I don’t have to feel bad about it.


  • The shit candidates that the Democrats provide are a consequence of them being a business party (read GOP candidates), the two (business) parties system is a consequence of the “”“”“free market”“”“” and a large populous of Americans decelerating revolutionary movements just before they (wrongly) think it will negatively impact them.

    Edit: holy fuck dude you’re just in these comments defending uneducated voters with your all, people choose not to inform themselves on how policy will be enacted, they choose to listen to Trumps rambling and choose to block out any critique of it, if you reduced voters to just voters then you might have a point, but these are real people with real lives who – believing the USA to be the most powerful country in the world, and despite likely having loved ones of their own, in a wide range of circumstances – decided to vote for a jingoistic, bigoted, lying childremoved. ANYONE who voted for Trump is evil, ignorance is not an excuse when you chose to be ignorant (this might be too hardline since there is a lot of manufacturing consent in the west, but I don’t wanna write about that so for this edit just pretend they are all free thinking, which I assume you’re doing since you called someone a sheep in your other comment)






  • they tend also to be fans of Putin, the CCP, the Iranian government, Hamas, and the North Korean government, despite many of those being right-wing.

    nothing burger of a statement that obviously tries to blur the line between social issues and economic policy, maybe a decade more of social progression will stop uncle Bob from caring about not being able to feed his family, or maybe uncle Bob will (scary) blame the centre of Libs attention for his situation and vote for some bigot who is otherwise a near cut and paste cuck for big business.

    What is the deal with their bad faith arguments too, there is easily accessible evidence rebuking the “genocidal USSR” slop but these fake leftists couldn’t bother to use google?






  • Why even pretend? If you consistently shill for the dems and nurture an intellectually homogenous dem-voting demographic, is it not natural that an interest group whose goals you are achieving would want to financially support you (furthering their control of your demographic, but also just their interests in general)?

    I’m not sure what sponsorship law is like but I can’t imagine that not broadcasting a view without disclosing that you have a financial incentive to not show that view would be illegal. Other than that no shit right? Shill for the business party (but woke sometimes) is caught up in decades old business tactics?!?! I bet the viewers are gonna be so surprised until they blame the individual and find the next yet-to-be-exposed shill.


  • leafperson [any, any]@hexbear.nettoSlop.@hexbear.netMeanwhile in Australia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Nah they’re right, we should condemn them because they are bigots who have consistently voted against their stated interests (Claim to hate immigration yet vote for the bombing other countries and displacing millions parties), ohh or maybe we should condemn them because the organiser for their Sydney protest openly states that they believe “Australian values” and “white values” are interchangeable terms.