I mean, cool-van art is neat, but it’d be cooler if it was actually painted on there and not a photoshop. Also: side pipe exhaust is reeaaal convincing there.

staples. nice.

“bad leaf! bad!” -scold vs. scald.

Just for fun. good comment!

This must be the first pre-1492 photograph I’ve seen. OMG. The ancients invented were gifted photography from aliens!

it’s worse than that given the electoral college setup. An outright majority doesn’t really matter.

Were they gifted this plane making the flight or am I just not understanding where price of the plane itself is being paid. Is that the depreciation bit?

“You know, I’m something of an expert myself”

gonna find some merry men and get a band going!

but but but it’s an historical document, not religious at all [wink wink to stage left]

I mean, yes, disappointing (and yes this is the leftism community so I get it), but it doesn’t look like he’s doing a Sinema or a Cotham.

Maher then asked him to explain what he meant what he stated last year “I’m not a progressive, I’m just a regular Democrat” and how he separates himself from progressivism

That’s an awesome one! Great backstory for the villain guy.

Stronghold was another good one - it had a synth that was indistinguishable from the real xenomorphs that could go into the areas where they were farming the things. Not as dark as Labyrinth though.

I don’t know what that graph is using as small, but the Fiat 500e has been sold here for quite some time. There is an electric Mini, an electric Focus, and the Bolt EUV is pretty small. SUV is sort of meaningless to define size alone when it encompasses things from the Bolt EUV and Model Y to a Cadillac Lyriq. Smaller ones usually classified as crossovers/CUVs.

I too don’t know what this means. After much searching I believe this could be a reference to the whirling dervishes of Sufism. More likely than dowsing in my opinion.

Where were you in '91? You could have won Randi’s prize! wikipedia on Dowsing

Good linking. The book says it’s for a quarter acre, not a tenth. This was on reddit the other day (and it’s credited as such). Exact same wording and everything.

Where I was going was: effects can be different even if all choices and results are unethical. If one cares about the possible impacts of ones actions, consideration beyond “well it’s all unethical, so whatever” could be warranted.

are all unethical choices equal? Surely there are better and worse things?

Just criticises? Not “slams”, “destroys”, or eviscerates? Weak. No rage click from me.

groan

Heartbreaking: The Worst Person You Know Just Made A Great Point uses the comma the way you think it should be used

Love this show!