Whole point of fediverse was to get away from all that shit, why let them crawl in?
- 0 Posts
- 18 Comments
reksas@lemmings.worldto Videos@lemmy.world•Cloudflare Employee records her final meeting where HR tries to fire her12·2 年前Why would they care, people are just tools to them.
reksas@lemmings.worldto A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world•Good news, everyone! We temporarily stopped the orphan crushing machine!7·2 年前Another reason why everyone should stay clear of places that exploit workers, it could be you who orders food when someone had to come work sick.
reksas@lemmings.worldto Fediverse@lemmy.world•How to Kill a Decentralised Network (such as the Fediverse)English51·2 年前Why would anyone want millions of users to come here? Everything that becomes popular or has potential to make a lot of money is always ruined eventually.
reksas@lemmings.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•The Pentagon is moving toward letting AI weapons autonomously decide to kill humansEnglish1·2 年前Letting it learn is just new technology that is possible. Not bad on its own but it has so much potential to be used for good and evil.
But yes, its pretty bad if they are creating machines that learn how to kill people by themselves. Create enough of them and its unknown amount of mistakes and negligence from actually becoming localized “ai uprising”. And if in the future they create some bigger ai to manage bunch of them handily, possibly delegate production to it too because its more efficient and cheaper that way, then its even bigger danger.
Ai doesnt even need sentience to do unintended stuff, when I have used chatgpt to help me create scripts it sometimes seems to kind of decide on its own to do something in certain way that i didnt request or add something stupid. Though its usually also kind of my own fault for not defining what i want properly, but mistake like that is also really easy to make and if we are talking about defining who we want the ai to kill it becomes really awful to even think about.
And if nothing happens and it all works exactly as planned, its kind of even bigger problem because then we have country(s) with really efficient, unfeeling and massproduceable soldiers that do 100% as ordered, will not retreat on their own and will not stop until told to do so. With current political rise of certain types of people all around the world, this is even more distressing.
reksas@lemmings.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•The Pentagon is moving toward letting AI weapons autonomously decide to kill humansEnglish1·2 年前Unless its actually sentient, being able to decide whether to kill or not is just more advanced targeting system. Not saying its good thing they are doing this at all, this almost as bad as using tactical nukes.
reksas@lemmings.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•The Pentagon is moving toward letting AI weapons autonomously decide to kill humansEnglish1·2 年前The one who deployed the ai to be there to decide whether to kill or not
reksas@lemmings.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•OpenAI's offices were sent thousands of paper clips in an elaborate prank to warn about an AI apocalypseEnglish4·2 年前Police is already on its way to your location for speech containing anti-corporate sentiment, flagged by ai
reksas@lemmings.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•The Pentagon is moving toward letting AI weapons autonomously decide to kill humansEnglish11·2 年前That is like saying you cant punish gun for killing people
edit: meaning that its redundant to talk about not being able to punish ai since it cant feel or care anyway. No matter how long pole you use to hit people with, responsibility of your actions will still reach you.
reksas@lemmings.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Gamers enraged at Ubisoft for injecting ads into the middle of video gamesEnglish22·2 年前They are doing fucking what?!
reksas@lemmings.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Elon Musk vows ‘thermonuclear lawsuit’ as advertisers flee X over antisemitismEnglish31·2 年前And what do you do when someone is actually doing something malicious?
clarification edit: malicious people can easily pretend to be stupid and claim they have made a mistake when they do bad shit.
reksas@lemmings.worldto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: Social media platforms attach trackers to the end of share URLs (which you can and should delete)12·2 年前What if you modify the tracker, like change some letters? Could that mess up their system if many did it?
reksas@lemmings.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•The EU will finally free Windows users from BingEnglish3·2 年前Once windows 10 becomes unuseable, I will switch to linux no matter what. Considering they are already testing the waters about subscription for OS, there is nothing they will stop for.
I wouldn’t be surprised if they completely started preventing regular users from having administrator rights to their own computers and you would either have to buy more expensive licence or just contact some ms support ai and beg it to do what you need admin rights for. Most users most likely wouldn’t even notice or care since you dont need administator account to do things majority of people use computers for.
reksas@lemmings.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Chrome not proceeding with Web Integrity API deemed by many to be DRMEnglish3·2 年前this has me thinking, i might actually be interested in looking at ads if they had only completely random things, like literally anything that exists. At least i wouldnt be annoyed with them so much.
Yea, that is suppression, be it intentional or not.
Most people just accept what is happening to them -> apathy. When people stop being apathetic things start happening, for better or worse. Desperate people usually do desperate things which tends to be bad for everyone involved.
reksas@lemmings.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Meta given 30 days to cease using the name Threads by company that trademarked it 11 years agoEnglish4·2 年前That would be the sensible approach, but some executive is propably throwing tantrum because of their injured pride. I will be surprised if they just comply.
so its technically possible to run excel with excel