I’m still on the starter ship so no combat yet.
I once managed to find a missile launcher that would fit into its specs, but for some reason, was unable to shoot it, so no idea if it was me not understanding the controls or that I missed some parameter (I had replaced the battery with supercapacitors to make space for the launcher), but again, no combat.
That was my first session. I played ~9hrs.

In my second session, I opened the main screen and instead of starting the game, I kept on staring at the compass icon for a while, imagining stuff. Then I quit the game and made this.
~12 hrs (I’m not regular at blender, so had to re-look for all UI stuff)

Unfortunately, their main discourse seems to be on Discord, which I don’t use.
Would be nice to have the community use open protocols for communication.

Let me know if you want the Blender files.
I plan on adding some texture and lighting to this, next I have time.

I am guessing you would have separate mounts for .cache, .local and .config ?

Yeah, everyone (every-app) thinks they are special and deserve a “.place” in ~ because : <enter their reason>.

• ssh because “I’m SSH!”, similar for gpg
• npm because “I’m a package manager”
• dillo because “I am old and can’t be bothered to update my dirs”
  • I guess I should send them a patch. It shouldn’t be too hard to make that little change.
• fltk same as dillo maybe
• .mozilla : “Oh but I AM special”
• .bundle : There is literally only 1 subdir in it and it is named “cache”. they could have just done “~/.cache/bundle” instead

IDK why you have a .kde in your screenshot. Debian maybe, or a dir remaining from KDE4? I had an old one remaining in Debain after I upgraded.

• .config
• .local
• .cache

These are what we need to stuff everything into.

I didn’t get this.

Why return book? Does that have some Blizzard reference?
And why would number == 2 ⇒ return false? This is a function for getting true when the number is even, right?

Ah right. I didn’t register that they are calling it AI.
Maybe just an image pattern recognition tool made with ML for the damage.

not charged for pre-existing damage

Tech seems fine. I just won’t expect that statement to be true.

The only way the customer has, to know if the damage was pre-existing, is to have their own machine to check it while receiving it, because for a company charging that high for a small amount of damage, I won’t expect them to actually try being fair with properly checking for pre-existing damage on checkout.

Then considering how the amount is significantly greater than what it would take to fix it, the employees might as well be adding minor amounts of damage themselves before scanning it.

then links to the company’s security@whatever email

It didn’t on 2nd June so I’d say that’s not the case.
Web pages change.

Are you sure it wasn’t just the frontend on your system that froze?

I am not going to try understanding your reasoning behind saying that nor try to explain ratio and proportions.

While at the same time, this is just a ‘perception’ thing.
The user is always downloading all the JS, just not really keeping it in a place they would look at and not having to click a “Download” button.

They say “Take it with a grain of salt.” and not “Take it with a grain of Sea Salt.”.
So I am just saying - Use black salt for the grains and you get less Na per grain.

That would have been correct in the pre-domestication era.

sodium intake becomes dangerously high

Perhaps switch to black salt?

It’s just literally an average online experience.

I am going to refute that claim as I don’t see monitors falling out of windows everyday.
And I am pretty sure people are doing “online” stuff.

Imagine having to navigate that site to buy a new monitor, without a monitor.

Just build the OSS version of java-impl with the patched version number as expected by the shitty software.

That looks like buttons in the thumbnail, on the left of the visualisation.
I’d say that’s enough to call it UI.

I would consider 2K at 27" to be the sweet spot for 1x.

“just turn it off lol”

Yeah, that’s probably just people who read the initial comments from back when secure boot keys were not user configurable (and support wasn’t available in Linux) and kept on echoing it all the way to the present.

Kinda similar to the “Linux is just secure” echoers, who might have started from some proper argument explaining what kinds of security problems don’t exist in systems developed using Linux and why they don’t require installing a 24/7 antivirus background process. Because people tend to make catchphrases. I too sometimes, forget the implications and tend to make them.