• 3 Posts
  • 399 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 22nd, 2023

help-circle
  • If they’re at MY door, what else can be done but defend my life with my life?

    That’s what I meant with you wouldn’t do anything. First you’d still have other options and if ICE is at your door and you start shooting at them it will probably kill you faster.

    You sound pretty flippant with people’s lives

    That was not my intention. It totally get why nobody is doing anything, especially with guns, because of the consequences. I just pointed out that so many people in favor of armed civilians bring completely flawed arguments and now we actually see in action how useless a “regulated militia” is.

    why don’t you go grab a gun and suicide into an armed force for great justice?

    Why would I? I don’t have a gun and never argued in favor of armed civilians, because it’s completely useless (and research shows that it only increases the chances of domestic violence and suicide). Maybe it wasn’t useless at the time the constitution was written but the current situation shows that it is now. Besides that I live in Vienna.









  • I’m pretty sure she couldn’t. She would wonder why she couldn’t contact anyone from her contact list. Sending individual links to probably hundreds of people without knowing if they use Simplex is completely unfeasible. Signal and WhatsApp you just open the app, immediately see who else uses it and can start texting. No multiple profiles, no meeting to scan QR codes or sending links, which is especially ironic because she would probably send that via Signal or WhatsApp 🤣




  • I see what you mean but that’s not what I thought China did. I thought they just declared every prisoner automatically an organ donor which would totally be fine IMHO.

    I live in Europe (Austria) and the solitary-based health care system is amazing. Automatically declaring everybody a donor is the best thing you can do (in in that case there wouldn’t even be a difference if you are a prisoner or not).

    If you ask me we should even get rid of the option to opt out unless in well founded court approved exceptions. Opting out of being an organ donor is probably the most egocentric, selfish thing one could do. You are dead and you still want to deny helping others at literally no additional cost for you.

    It also has practically the opposite effect of what you mentioned. If you only have a few organ donors and one is in a bad condition in a hospital there a probably a few people that hope they don’t make it to get the organs. But if everybody is an organ donor the situation gets much simpler because there isn’t this artificial scarcity.

    Long story short, I haven’t heard a single good argument for not being an organ donor except that people could care less about the paper work to opt-in. That’s why the European opt-out system is way better, but many US citizens probably would call that communism :-)



  • You are definitely right but it’s probably almost right at the sweet spot. Decentralization/federation is great for privacy, but think about what most non-technical people can handle. With federation alone, practically all non-tech people would even fail (or be confused by) the first step, namely to find an instance.

    So are there more privacy friendly options than Signal? Definitely. But are those user friendly enough most people could use it? I can’t think of one, but would live to hear some alternatives that are simple enough my mom could use it.


  • Why would they phase that out? Once you are dead you don’t need organs. I’m so happy to live in a country where you have to explicitly opt out of organ donation if you don’t want to be a donor (many EU countries do it that way).

    Every country where you have to opt in to be an organ donor has it completely backwards.

    Update: ok maybe, I should have read the article

    sometimes when patients are still alive

    Ok that’s fucked up


  • No that’s impossible with your voice even for those slow speeds back then. But one could implement a similar system that converts sound to data/images if you invent you own modulation depending on how precise you can make sounds. If you are totally ungifted with your voice like me, the simplest would probably be something like morse. If you have perfect pitch you could use many different frequencies and amplitudes and combine those (a bit like QAM but without phase modulation, because humans can’t control the phase with their vocal cords). The more different frequency-amplitude combinations you can make and the faster you can switch between them the faster you “manual” data transmission could be.

    Sounds actually pretty fun to play around with 🤣

    PS: I personally would drop amplitude modulation and only use different frequencies (FM) and only pick a few different values (maybe four? or eight - one octave cdefgabc’) with variable speed (decoding based on short pauses between notes) to be most reliable.

    PPS: what did you (and adhd) do to me 😅. Now I want to make something like that and have no time on my hands anyway.


  • The screaming was not only during handshake. The acoustic coupler you see in the image was making that “scream” all the time (that’s how the data was transmitted), so no noise, no communication/data.

    People got so used to the noise that some of them could even diagnose connection issues based on the sound the coupler made.

    When modems were updated they internally converted the data directly to electrical signals to be sent over the telephone via, without the audio indirection, but most modems had a built in speaker anyway that still played back the audio during handshake (on default settings) to allow users to hear/debug connection issues.

    Practically all modems from that time allowed you to turn off that noise - even during handshake.

    Over the years the need to “hear” the data went away.